The
Intel Atom processor is a neat little device. It’s miserly in its
use of electricity, so in laptops and netbooks it gives great battery
life. It also generates relatively little heat, which makes it good
for fanless applications. I’ve seen some camera companies use it
in their smart cameras too, but I have to question the wisdom of
doing so.
I’ve
nothing against the little processor that could – in fact I have
one in the netbook I’m typing this on – but they’re not really
up to high-speed image processing.
So
you’ll understand my surprise in learning that Dalsa – sorry,
Teledyne Dalsa – have launched a vision PC built around the little
fellow. The box I’m referring to is the GEVA-300.
Now I try to avoid being negative, but really Dalsa, an Atom-based
machine? And it’s intended for multiple cameras. Why not just step
up to an i5? Was the whole point just to have a fanless offering?
And
to that point, if you spend just a couple of minutes on the Dalsa
site you’ll see they offer such a device, the GEVA-1000. It’s not
clear what processor it actually employs, but I’m figuring that the
bigger model number means more horsepower under the hood. I don’t
know what the price difference is either, but I’ll wager anyone who
buys the 300 will later wish they’d stepped up to the 1000.
1 comment:
What does the processor type really tell? It's all about image size and algorithms.
Cognex doesn't tell anything about their chips, maybe to avoid bitching about "not enough power" :)
Post a Comment