Product
names are important, and it’s especially important that they be
unique. This is why there’s no Dodge Corvette or Toyota Civic:
customers would be confused. (Although I don’t quite get why BMW
and Audi both think it’s a good move to have 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
series models.)
So
if you’re a camera-maker, like say Xenics,
and you’re launching a new range, wouldn’t you spend a few
minutes on-line to make sure you’ve got a new and unique name?
Apparently
not, because they’ve called their new SWIR camera the Bobcat.
That’s interesting, because when I think of a Bobcat camera I think
of the extensive family from Imperx.
Now
I understand these two companies don’t “play in the same space,”
to steal a stomach-churning phrase from the MBA’s. SWIR is of
interest to those who are imaging biological objects, like fruit or
people, and for those who might want better images in low visibility
conditions, like those working on surveillance, while the Imperx
cameras are just really nice, low-noise, high-speed, machine vision
cameras. So perhaps the markets are different and buyers won’t get
confused. But it still strikes me as silly to use a name that’s
already in service.
I
wonder what the trademark lawyers have to say about it?
No comments:
Post a Comment