Sunday, October 3, 2010

CMOS or CCD?


My colleagues, being a conservative bunch, are adamant that CCD sensors are far superior to CMOS. I however try to keep an open mind. I think CMOS-based machine vision cameras have a few things in their favor, like high speed, dynamic range and resistance to blooming. However, I am forced to admit that the rolling shutter can be a significant drawback.

(A rolling shutter exposes a single line of pixels at a time, which mean that when acquiring an image of something in motion it will appear to slant. The alternative, a global shutter, exposes all the pixels simultaneously.)

So all this means that I was interested in a new product announcement from camera-maker IDS Imaging. They’ve recently unveiled a line of cameras that incorporate a new CMOS sensor from e2v. This, it is claimed, gives the best of both CCD and CMOS sensors. Hopefully that includes lower cost!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dalsa has good writing about the topic: http://www.dalsa.com/mv/knowledge/ccd_vs_cmos.aspx

Anonymous said...

Here's a good example of what a CMOS rolling shutter is capable of doing:
http://scorpionvision.co.uk/FAQRetrieve.aspx?ID=37060