Here’s
something to file under “Why, oh why?”: Machine vision cameras
need to be mounted on a plate of some kind. To make this possible the
manufacturers usually provide a number of small threaded holes –
typically M3 – to which a bigger plate can be fitted. But the
bigger camera mounting plate typically has a single ¼-20, or
possibly M6, screw thread.
This
makes no sense to me. Securing a camera with a single screw means
it’s going to move. It’s just not a robust, industrial, mounting.
So why not put two holes on a 1” or 25mm spacing? Wouldn’t that
make for a more depending mounting?
And
while we’re at it, let’s go further. Would it be possible to tie
down the relationship between sensor mount, the M3 threads in the
camera body, and the ¼-20/M6 threads in the mounting plate?
What
I’m asking for is that when I engineer a mount I can bolt the
camera in to place and know with some certainty that it’s pointing
in the right direction. I don’t want to nudge it left and right
while watching a monitor until it’s pointing the right way. You
know what happens then: I clamp it down and it moves, so I have to
repeat the exercise. Can’t cameras be engineered to just bolt right
in?
Is
this too much to ask?
2 comments:
Is there a LIKE button ;)?
I agree. Standard "industrial grade" mount would be great. I wonder what kind of incentive big companies would need to agree and use something like this..
Post a Comment